|
Article - Terry
Walstrom reflects on Bond without Barry
Before
I say anything that sounds absolute I'll try to make two things
fairly clear:
1.
I am a Michel Legrand fan
2.
I am a James Bond/John Barry fan.
There!
I
was very excited at the prospect of Sean Connery portraying James
Bond again way back in 1983. Roger Ebert himself called it a "minor
movie miracle". How much fun could he have with the role again after
being absent so long?
When
it became clear that Barry would refuse to take part due to misplaced
(in my opinion misplaced in view of how he has been treated since)
loyalty to the producers of the original series - I wondered like
everybody else - WHO could fill his shoes. Cut to the chase. Michel
Legrand was chosen. That really didn't bother me. Barry has a style
of jazz that is personal to him and so does Michel Legrand. Both
are masters at arrangements of all kinds of orchestral instrumentation.
Both have music that is exciting and melodic. What's to fear?
Fast
forward. I attended the World Premiere of the film Never Say
Never Again which was also attended by Connery, Carrera, Caine,
Rhonda Fleming and a host of other luminaries. I was high on life.
I even got to pee with Caine and Connery. (That is another story
for another time.) In the audience during the film Caine and Connery
sat three rows behind me. A weird thing happened. Nothing. No audience
reaction! Even to the funny parts. It was a vacuum. Strangest thing
I've ever been a part of while in a packed house with lots of excitement
in the air. What was going on? Years later I can guess.
1.With
Connery in the role - I for one - and others - expected the originator
of the role to kick Roger Moore's butt with a scintillating movie
that showed the other guys how it is done. It didn't happen.
2.
The ‘FORM’ wasn't observed. The original series has a form to it
- a kind of dogma that has been engrained in the fans and we've
come to expect it. Didn't happen. It was more of a pale imitation
of form. (More about this later.)
3.The
‘plot’ wasn't allowed to stray far enough from Thunderball (as an
officially allowed remake) to be very compelling. Instead - it wasn't
even as interesting as Thunderball.
4.
The music was, WAY, WAY different!
Now
I professed at the beginning of this post to be a Legrand fan. I
am and I was. I thought his score was just dandy for Never Say Never
Again - but, not as JAMES BOND music! In fact - it was alienating
in the same way that, years later, another composer would alienate
fans by being sooooo different. Legrand wasn't copying Barry. I
praise him for that. Legrand has integrity and talent - no need
to enter into stylistic plagiarism. David Arnold did a bang up imitation
recently - but, it deeply troubles me (on another level which is
irrelevant) that he cannot successfully do his ‘own’ thing and make
it work without stepping into Barry's skin. (That's a different
can of worms which we'll ignore for now).
So
Michel Legrand did his take on Bond and it didn't work. Why why
why? I think it is only partly Legrand's fault. 50% of the problem
is mysterious fandom. And - ready for this? I think it ties in to
recent arguments about ORIGINAL vs. Re-recorded scores. When you
cannot divorce your mind and your emotions from the original you
just cannot accept anything new or different! So - as Bond fans
and as Barry fans -we had a level of NON-acceptance which Legrand
could not hurdle. Can anybody? David Arnold found a way to gain
acceptance. But - not on his own terms. At least as far as originality
is concerned.
Barry
has written some silly songs for the James Bond movies. But - the
style and bravura arrangements and performances WORK dammit! NEVER
SAY NEVER AGAIN is no more/less ludicrous than MAN WITH THE GOLDEN
GUN. But - one works and the other doesn't. I purposely picked the
worst Barry song I could. Lulu is herself doing a kind of Shirley
Bassey put-on in her performance. The lyric is not the best of the
series. The arrangement is not the purest Barry/Bond. However, there
is an absurd stylistic bravura that SELLS the song - I'll call it
pure audacity! It is a sure-footed second rate song that has great
charisma and drive – and - most importantly to fans - it sounds
James Bondish. NEVER SAY NEVER doesn't have an edge. It doesn't
have a powerhouse performance. It doesn't have a wicked Bondian
spirit. It fails. End of story.
What
James Bond needs and what John Barry gave the series is a kind of
playful, yet deadly seriousness. His scores have an ingenuity about
them as well. His Bond scores are like crossword puzzles. The Main
Theme is spelled out here and there; horizontally and vertically
in the most oddball modalities. He takes a piece here and a piece
there - and weaves it into a whole made up of easily recognisable
parts. Barry constantly self-references the Bond Theme and the Main
Title. You know where you stand. The instruments are familiar. The
rhythms are familiar. The C minor7th/9th chords comes along right
on schedule. Yet - the score is new and fresh.
Michel
Legrand scored the film as though it were a European spoof of a
spy movie made in the late 60s. There is never the feeling that
anything is serious. It is tongue-in-cheek always. Where Barry would
be ‘serious’ - Legrand would be hip. Where Barry would be outrageously
sinister - Legrand would be fey. You see - the personality and temperament
are quite different. I think the secret of John Barry's personality
is that he – HE IS James Bond! Look at his lifestyle. He
has the best of everything. He has the best looking women, the best
clothes, the best cars - the international globe-hopping and YET-he
is strangely anonymous. In the movies James Bond is well known by
reputation - but, he is a Secret Agent. Odd! How many people on
this planet really know who John Barry is?
Since
Barry is Bond and Michel Legrand is not - how could it ever work?
Soooooo, we end up hating Michel Legrand's score. Undeservedly in
many ways. Deservedly in others. A fan cannot change his love-affair
with authenticity. A good copy is still a copy. Bond is an original.
Barry is an original. Legrand is a European romantic and not a cool
super sleuth. I rest my case.
Terry
Walstrom |